At a Glance:
The New Jersey Appellate Court affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit seeking to overturn the state’s medical aid-in-dying law on June 10, 2022. The challenge had been ongoing since August 2019, when opponents challenged the law alleging it violated their constitutional rights. Compassion & Choices submitted an amicus brief to the appellate court, and argued before the court in May 2022, urging it to affirm the lower court’s ruling. The lower court had dismissed the case in April 2020, stating that Plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the law since they were completely unharmed by the wholly voluntary medical aid-in-dying act.
In 2019, New Jersey passed the Aid in Dying for the Terminally Ill Act, legalizing medical aid in dying for qualifying New Jersey residents. On August 8, 2019, just over a week after the law took effect, Dr. Yosef Glassman filed a Complaint and a Motion to Show Cause in Mercer County Superior Court. Dr. Glassman alleged that the law violated his free exercise rights, despite the fact that physician participation in medical aid in dying is entirely voluntary under the Act. Among his other allegations, Dr. Glassman argued that the New Jersey Constitution recognizes a fundamental right to protect or defend the lives of others and that the state’s medical aid in dying law was in violation of that right. Two other plaintiffs later joined the case – a pharmacist and a terminally ill individual who opposed the law on religious or personal grounds.
On August 14, 2019, the first day terminally ill patients who qualified under the Act would have been able to obtain a prescription, a Mercer County Judge issued a temporary restraining order, blocking patients from accessing medical aid in dying. This order was overturned by the New Jersey Appellate Court in a decision issued on August 27, 2019, which held that the lower court “abused its discretion” when it suspended the law.
On April 1, 2020, following a motion by the state Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, a Mercer County Judge dismissed all claims with prejudice. The Superior Court held that Plaintiffs lacked standing to bring a claim against the Act because the Act did not harm or affect them in any cognizable way. The Superior Court further recognized that “the State has a legitimate interest, perhaps even a compelling interest, in establishing a safe and effective procedure for qualified terminally ill patients to experience a humane and dignified death.”
After the case was dismissed opponents submitted a Motion for Reconsideration. This motion was subsequently denied by the Court on May 22, 2020. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal on July 13, 2020.
Compassion & Choices, along with Lynne Lieberman—a terminally-ill New Jersey resident—and Dr. Paul Bryman—a hospice and palliative care physician practicing in New Jersey—submitted an amicus brief on April 2, 2021, urging the Court of Appeal to affirm the lower court’s dismissal of the case. The amicus brief, arguing in favor of New Jersey’s medical aid-in-dying law, stated:
[Plaintiffs] call on this Court to upend well-established precedent by limiting an individual’s right to self-determine their end-of-life medical care and altering the traditional patient-physician relationship in obtaining informed consent. This notion contravenes New Jersey courts’ long-established recognition of an individual’s right to make their own end-of-life choices, even when those choices diverge from the advice of a physician. Appellants may disagree with the end-of-life choices granted by the Act, but those choices are the individual’s alone to make.
On June 10, 2022, the New Jersey Appellate Court affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of opponents’ lawsuit.
On August 15, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Petition for Certification and requested a time extension until November 23, 2022, indicating they plan to appeal the Appellate Court’s decision to the New Jersey Supreme Court. Unlike the Appellate Court, the Supreme Court has discretion to decide the appeals it hears and could decline to hear Plaintiffs’ case.
Compassion & Choices remains vigilant against any and all efforts by Plaintiffs to overturn the law and any other legal challenges to the law in the future. More information will be provided as it becomes available.